![]() You would never suspect such a disproportionate ratio looking at last year’s “standdown” discussion guides, which included four examples of “problematic behaviors” – all of them referencing neo-Nazi and white supremacy groups. That’s 84.7% of the civic violence in America across summer 2020.” This makes no sense because, as Mollie Hemingway noted in her book, “ Rigged,” the Armed Conflict Location and Event Data Project (ACLED) tracks incidents of violence instigated by extremist groups of both the right and the left. Kevin Roberts of the Washington Examiner cited ACLED in reporting, “of 1,101 violent incidents across 97 days, 933 of them directly involved Black Lives Matter. Four research contractors are working on DOD anti-extremist projects, but training materials concentrate on extremists on the far right of the political spectrum, not the far left. Kirby said he had no specifics, a peculiar response since the Defense Department tracks everything from bullets to battleships. Griffin asked Kirby for a breakdown: “What portion if any, members of the sort of groups that you might consider white supremacist groups or were there also some who may have been present at a Black Lives Matter protest?” Out of two million military members, the CEAWG report admits that incidents are “rare. Clayton County ruling expanding transgender employment rights did not apply to the military, but some will argue that it did.Įxtremism of any kind is unacceptable, but Austin’s obsession with radicalism in the ranks has not been proportionate or even-handed. So, if a female Naval Academy midshipman opposes biological males in her own or other women’s swim teams, is she advocating “unlawful discrimination” based on gender identity? The Supreme Court’s 2020 Bostock v. As with COVID vaccination mandates, accommodations for religious liberty are unlikely. Under the new rules, local commanders will be responsible for reviewing individual cases and punishing anyone “Advocating widespread unlawful discrimination based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex (including pregnancy), gender identity, or sexual orientation.”ĭefinitions of unacceptable activities are extremely broad and could apply to situations that would otherwise be protected by the First Amendment. a military breakdown could lead to civil war.” In a still available 2019 tweet, Garrison himself accused Trump supporters of “normalizing” the actions of “extremists,” and “racists.” ![]() Capitol, writing, “We are chilled to our bones about a coup succeeding next time. In a Washington Post op-ed, three retired general officers hyperventilated about their fears of another attack on the U.S. Advocates of voter identification measures, for example, have been accused of “threatening democracy” and “promoting election sabotage.”įormer FBI assistant director Andrew McCabe has put conservatives in the same category as Islamic terrorists, and some partisans see military “extremism” everywhere. With the politicized, woke culture taking hold in the Pentagon, actions reflecting independent thought could jeopardize careers. Kirby added, “If you’re advocating for, as I said, the overthrow of the government, or you’re actively undermining the oath that you took to the Constitution. The devil here is not in the details it will be in interpretations. Would a soldier’s “like” on a post “Joe Biden is not the president,” for example, be punishable as extremist behavior?įox News reporter Jennifer Griffin asked that question at a Pentagon briefing. Spokesman John Kirby dodged the “hypothetical,” but referred to updated rules against “posting, liking, sharing, re-tweeting, or otherwise distributing content when such action is taken with the intent to promote or otherwise endorse extremist activities.” The Pentagon also forbids, “Advocating or engaging in unlawful force or violence to achieve goals that are political, religious, discriminatory, or ideological in nature.” New regulations add, “Military personnel are responsible for the content published on all personal and public Internet domains, including social media sites, blogs, websites, and applications.” The resulting CEAWG report recommended updates to a Defense Department Instruction ( DoDI 1325.6), which defines and prohibits “active participation” in “extremist activities.” These include, “Advocating, engaging in or supporting terrorism” the “overthrow of the government of the United States.”
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |